Kvinder på pensum

Her finder du en liste over forslag til relevante pensum-tekster skrevet af kvindelige filosoffer.
Teksterne er sorteret i overordnede emner efter alfabetisk orden.

Emnerne er:

Listen er baseret på anbefalinger fra undervisere på de danske universiteter. Hvis du har tilføjelser (også gerne i emner vi endnu ikke har på listen), så send os endelig en mail!


Du kan finde yderligere ressourcer på følgende andre hjemmesider:

Pensumtekster

Anvendt filosofi

  • Nussbaum, Martha (1999). “Religion and Women’s Rights”, i Kessler, Gary E (red.) Philosophy of Religion: Toward a Global Perspective. Wadsworth; London. 312-325.
  • Uniacke, Suzanne (2016). “The Value of Applied Philosophy”, i Lippert‐Rasmussen, K. et al. (red.) A Companion to Applied Philosophy. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; Oxford. 34-48 (DOI:10.1002/9781118869109)

Argumentationsteori og metode

  • Bowell, Tracy & Gary Kemp (2010). “Rethorical Ploys and Fallacies (Chap. 4)”, i Critical Thinking, A Concise Guide (CT) ,3. ed. Routledge; London. 99-154

Bevidsthedsfilosofi

  • Markova, I.S., Berrios, G. (2016). “Research in Psychiatry: Concepts and Conceptual Analysis”, Psychopathology 49: 188-194
  • Romdenh-Romluc, Komarine (2007). “Merleau-Ponty’s Account of Hallucination”, European Journal of Philosophy 17: 76–90.

Etik/Moralfilosofi

Kvindelige filosoffer der arbejder med emner relevante for etik/moralfilsofi: G.E.M Anscombe.

Normativ etik

  • Banks, Sarah & Ann Galagher (2009). “Virtue Ethics and Professional Life (chap 2)”, i Ethics in professional life: Virtues for health and social care. Palgrave MacMillan; Houndsmill, Basinstoke. 28-49
  • Christensen, Anne-Marie S. (2011). ”Dydsetik”, i Christensen, A.M.S (red.) Filosofisk etik. Aarhus Universitetsforlag; Århus. 99-120
  • Christensen, Anne-Marie S. (2011). ”Normativ etik – en oversigt”, i Christensen, A.M.S (red.) Filosofisk etik. Aarhus Universitetsforlag; Århus. 21-54
  • Christensen, Anne-Marie S. (2008). Moderne dydsetik. Aarhus Universitetsforlag; Århus (Særligt kap 2: 48-76, og kap 4: 113-132)
  • Thott, Birgitte (1661). Epictetus: Epicteti liden Haandbog som viser hvorledis mand Sindets Rolighed ved det mand om det timelige ret skiønner oc det ey missbruger, kan erlange, Birgitte Thott (kommenteret og overs. fra latin). København, trykt af Matthia Gødicche.
  • Thott, Birgitte (1658). “DEDICATIO” (on women’s intellectual studies) i Lucii Annæi Senecæ den Vitberømte oc nafnkundige Philosophi eller Vissdoms-elskeris Skrifter. Digitalisering 2019 (Rex) af udgave: Sorøe: trykt af Georg Hantsch.
  • Pahuus, Anne Marie (2011). “Nærhedsetik” i Christensen, A.M.S (red.) Filosofisk etik. Aarhus Universitetsforlag; Århus.

Bioetik

  • Anderson, Elizabeth (2004). “Animal rights and the values of nonhuman life” i Sunstein, Cass & Martha Nussbaum (red.) Animal rights: Current debates and new directions, Oxford University Press. 
  • Ballantyne, Angela (2014). “Exploitation in cross-border reproductive care”, The international journal of feminist approaches to bioethics, 7(2): 75-99.
  • Barclay, Linda (2016). “A natural alliance against a common foe? Opponents of enhancement and the social model of disability”, i Clarke, Steven et al. (red.) The ethics of human enhancement: Understanding the debate. Oxford University Press.
  • Battin, Margaret P. (2003). ”Bioethics”, i Frey, R. G. & Wellman, Christoffer Heath A Companion to Applied Ethics. Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
  • Beauchamp, Tom L & Ruth Faden (1986). “The concept of autonomy (chap 7)”, i A history and theory of informed consent. Oxford University Press. 235-268
  • Bullock, Emma C. (2015). “Assisted dying and the proper role of patient autonomy” i Cholbi, M. & J. Varelius (red.) New directions in the ethics of assisted suicide and euthanasia. Springer.
  • Christiansen, Andreas; Karin Jonch-Clausen & Klemens Kappel (2017). “Does controversial science call for public participation? The case of GMO skepticism”, The Ethics Forum/Les Ateliers de l’éthique, 12(1):26-50
  • Denny, Colleen C; Christine Grady (2007). “Clinical research with economically disadvantaged populations”, Journal of Medical Ethics, 33(7): 382-385.
  • Hallowell, Nina (2009). “Consent to genetic testing: A family affair?”, i Corrigan, Oonagh et al. (red.) The limits of consent. Oxford University Press.
  • Hawkins, Jennifer S. & Ezekiel J. Emanuel (2008). Exploitation and Developing Countries. Princeton University Press. (particularly: “Case studies: The Havrix Trial and the Surfaxin Trial”).
  • Kongsholm, Nana Cecilie Halmsted; Jesper Lassen & Peter Sandøe (2018). “I didn’t have anything to decide, I wanted to help my kids – an interview-based study of consent procedures for sampling human biological material for genetic research in rural Pakistan, AJOB”, Empirical Bioethics, (DOI:10.1080/23294515.2018.1472148)
  • Krutzinna, Jenny (2017). “Beyond an open future: Cognitive enhancement and the welfare of children”, Campbridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 26:313-325.
  • Kuhse, Helga (1998). “Why killing is not always worse – and sometimes better – than letting die”, Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare ethics, 7(4): 371-374.
  • Levine, Carol; Ruth Faden, Christine Grady et al. (2004). “The limitations of ‘vulnerability’ as a protection for human research participants”, The American Journal of Bioethics, 4(3): 44-49.
  • Luna, Florencia (2009). “Elucidating the concept of vulnerability: Layers not labels”, The International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics, 7(1): 121-139.
  • Manson, Neil C & Onora O’Neill (2007). “How to rethink informed consent”, i Rethinking Informed Consent in Bioethics. Cambridge University Press.
  • Nielsen, Lisbeth W (2014). “The concept of nature and the enhancement technologies debate”, i Savulescu et al. (red.) Enhancing human capacities. Blackwell Publishing.
  • Nussbaum, Martha (1998). “Whether from reason or prejudice: taking money for bodily services”, Journal of Legal Studies vol. 27, 693–724. 
  • O’Neill, Onora (2002). “Principled autonomy and genetic technologies”, i Autonomy and trust in bioethics. Cambridge University Press.
  • O’Neill, Onora (2002). “Autonomy, individuality and consent”, i Autonomy and trust in bioethics. Cambridge University Press.
  • Purdy, Laura M. (1990). “Are pregnant women fetal containers?”, Bioethics, 4(4):273-91.
  • Richards, Janet R. (2010). “Consent with inducements: The case of body parts and services”, i Miller, Franklin & Alan Wertheimer (red.): The ethics of consent: Theory and practice. Oxford University Press.
  • Roache, Rebecca (2018). “What sort of person could have a radically extended lifespan?”, Journal of Medical Ethics, 44(4):217-218
  • Rogers, Wendy (2014). “Vulnerability and bioethics”, i Mackenzie, Catriona et al. (red.) Vulnerability. Oxford University Press.
  • Rogers, Wendy; Catriona Mackenzie, and Susan Dodds (2012). ”Why Bioethics Needs a Concept of Vulnerability”, The international journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics, 5(2): 11-38. 
  • Sample, Ruth (2003). “What is bad about exploitation?”, i Exploitation. What it is and why it’s wrong. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers inc.
  • Satz, D (2010). Why Some Things Should Not be for Sale, New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Schermer, Maartje (2017). “On the argument that enhancement is ‘cheating’” i ter Meulen, Ruud et al. (red.) Rethinking cognitive enhancement. Oxford University Press.
  • Takal, Tuija (2004). “The (im)morality of (un)naturalness”, Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 13(1):15-19.
  • Thompson, Judith Jarvis (1971). “A defense of abortion”, Philosophy & Public Affairs, 1(1): 47-66.
  • Wenner, Danielle (2016). “Against permittted exploitation in developing world research agreements”, Developing World Bioethics, 16(1):36-44. 
  • Wilkinson, Ruth Hannah (2010). “Genetic Information: important but not “exceptional”, Identity in the Information Society, 3(3):457-472.

Metaetik

  • Christensen, Anne Marie S (2011). ”Non-naturalistisk realisme”, i Christensen, A.M.S (red.) Filosofisk etik. Aarhus Universitetsforlag; Århus. 355-376         
  • Diamond, Cora (2013). “Reading the Tractatus with G. E. M. Anscombe (chap22)”, in The Oxford Handbook of The History of Analytic Philosophy, Oxford University Press; Oxford.
  • Foot, Philippa (1958). ”Moral Arguments”, Mind 67/268: 502-13 
  • Little, Margarat Olivia (2000). ”Moral Generalities Revisited” in Little, Margarat Olivia & Brad Hooker (red.) Moral Particularism. Clarendon Press; Oxford. 276-304
  • Roeser, Sabine (2009). “The Relation between Cognition and Affect in Moral Judgments about Risk”, i Asveld, Lotte & Sabine Roeser (red.) The Ethics of Technological Risk. Earthscan; London. 182-201
  • Roeser, Sabine (2011). “Affectual Intuitionism” i Moral Emotions and Intuitions. Palgrave Macmillan. 138-179 
  • Young, Iris Marion (2011). “The Ideal Impartiality and the Civic Public (Chap. 4)”, i Justice and the Politics of Difference. Princeton University Press; Princton. 96-121

Feministisk filosofi

  •  Alanen, Lili & Charlotte Witt (red.) (2004). Feminist Reflections on the History of Philosophy, Dordrecht/Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers
  • Antony, Louise & Charlotte Witt (red.) (1993). A Mind of One’s Own: Feminist Essays on Reason and Objectivity, Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
  • Butler, Judith (1990). Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity, New York: Routledge.
  • Deutscher, Penelope (1997). Yielding Gender: Feminism, Deconstruction, and the History of Philosophy, London and New York: Routledge.
  • Gilligan, Carol (1993). In a different voice, Harvard University Press. 
  • Hutton, Sarah (2015). “ ’Blue-eyed Philosophers Born on Wednesdays’: An Essay on Women and the History of Philosophy”, The Monist 98: 7–20
  • Okin, Susan Moller (1980). Women in Western Political Thought, Princeton University Press.
  • O’Neill, Eileen (1998). “Disappearing Ink: Early Modern Women Philosophers and Their Fate in History” i Philosophy in a Feminist Voice: Critiques and Reconstructions, Kourany, Janet (red.), Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1998. 17-62
  • Schiebinger, L (1989). The Mind Has No Sex? Women in the Origins of Modern Science, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
  • Schurman, Anna Maria van (1998). Whether a Christian Woman Should Be Educated, Irwin, Joyce (red. og overs.), Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Willett, Cynthia, Ellie Anderson & Diana Meyers (2016). “Feminist Perspectives on the Self” i The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter Edition), Edward N. Zalta (red.).

Filosofihistorie

Metode

    null
  • Ebbersmeyer, Sabrina (2018). “Female Curiosity Preconditional and Women’s Voices from the Renaissance to The Early Modern Era” i Curiosity and The Passions of Knowledge from Montaigne to Hobbes, Rome. 139-160.
  • Witt, Charlotte & Lisa Shapiro (2018). “Feminist History of Philosophy”, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Antikken

  • Annas, J., 1993, The Morality of Happiness, New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Om stoikerne og stoicisme) 
  • Deslauriers M (2003). “Aristotle on the Virtues of Slaves and Women”, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 25: 222-229. 
  • Deslauriers, M (2009). “Sexual Difference in Aristotle’s Politics and His Biology”, Classical World, 102.3: 215– 231. 
  • Lange, L (1983). “Woman is not a Rational Animal: On Aristotle’s Biology of Reproduction”, i Discovering Reality, udg. S. Harding og M. B. Hintikka. Dordrecht. 1-16.

Renæssancens og nyere tids filosofi

  • Conway, Anne (1996). The Principles of the Most Ancient and Modern Philosophy, Allison P. Coudert & Taylor Corse (red.). Cambridge: CUP. 3-70. 
  • Elisabeth of Bohemia (2007). The correspondence between Elisabeth of Bohemia and René Descartes, Lisa Shapiro (red. & trans). Chicago: The University of Chicago press. 
  • Tarabotti, Arcangela (2004). Paternal Tyranny, Letizia Panizza (red. & trans.). Chicago: UCP.
  • Thott, Birgitte (1661). Epictetus: Epicteti liden Haandbog som viser hvorledis mand Sindets Rolighed ved det mand om det timelige ret skiønner oc det ey missbruger, kan erlange, Birgitte Thott (kommenteret og overs. fra latin). København, trykt af Matthia Gødicche.
  • Thott, Birgitte (1658). “DEDICATIO” (on women’s intellectual studies) i Lucii Annæi Senecæ den Vitberømte oc nafnkundige Philosophi eller Vissdoms-elskeris Skrifter. Digitalisering 2019 (Rex) af udgave: Sorøe: trykt af Georg Hantsch.
  • Wollstonecraft, Mary. A Vindication of the Rights of Men and A Vindication of the Rights of Women and Hints . Ed. by Sylvana Tomaselli, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2009. Introduction, Chapters 1 and 2 ; pp. 74 -108
  • Alenius, Marianne (1983). “Seneca-oversætteren Birgitte Thott” i Danske Studier, København. 5-47. 
  • Ebbersmeyer, Sabrina (2018). “Female Curiosity Preconditional and Women’s Voices from the Renaissance to The Early Modern Era” i Curiosity and The Passions of Knowledge from Montaigne to Hobbes, Rome. 139-160.
  • Hutton, Sarah (2015): “’Blue-eyed Philosophers Born on Wednesdays: An Essay on Women and the History of Philosophy”, The Monist, 98: 7–20.
  • Lloyd, Sharon A. & Sreedhar, Susanne (2018). “Hobbes’s Moral and Political Philosophy”The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer Edition)
  • O’Neill, Eileen (1998). “Disappearing Ink: Early Modern Women Philosophes and Their Fate in History”, i Kourany, Janet (red.) Philosophy in a Feminist Voice: Critiques and Reconstructions. Princeton: Princeton University Press. 17-62.
  • Rabin, Sheila (2015). “Nicolaus Copernicus”The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall Edition).
  • Shapiro, Lisa (2014). “Elisabeth, Princess of Bohemia”The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter Edition).
  • Stecher-Hansen, Marianne (2004). “Birghitte Thott” i Danish writers from the Reformation to decadence, 1550-1900. Detroit: Gale, A Bruccoli Clark Layman Book.
  • Tomaselli, Sylvana (2018). “Mary Wollstonecraft”The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall Edition)

Kontinentalfilosofi

  • Arendt, Hannah (1958). The Human Condition. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago. 
  • Arendt, Hannah (2003): ”Labor, work, action”, i The Portable Hannah Arendt, Penguin books.
  • Dastur, Françoise (2007). “Philosophy and Non-philosophy according to Merleau-Ponty”, i Baldwin T (red.) Reading Merleau-Ponty on Phenomenology of Perception. Routledge; London. 152-163
  • Kristeva, Julia (1982). “Approaching Abjection”, i Powers of Horror. An Essay on Abjection; New York, Columbia University Press. 1-18
  • Romdenh-Romluc, Komarine (2007). “Merleau-Ponty and the Power to Reckon with the Possible”, i Baldwin T (red.) Reading Merleau-Ponty on Phenomenology of Perception. Routledge; London.

Ontologi/Metafysik

  • Conway, Anne (1996). The Principles of the Most Ancient and Modern Philosophy, Allison P. Coudert & Taylor Corse (red.). Cambridge: CUP. 3-70. 
  • Cockburn, Catharine (1751). The Works of Mrs. Catharine Cockburn, Theological, Moral, Dramatic, and Poetical. 2 vols. J. & P. Knapton; London.
  • Duran, Jane (2013). “Early English Empiricism and the Work of Catherine Trotter Cockburn”, Metaphilosophy 44: 485-495.
  • Gill, Mary-Louise (2005). “Method and Metaphysics in Plato’s Sophist and Statesman“, i Zalta, Edward N (red.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. (Stanford Encyclopedia)
  • Gill, Mary-Louise (2005). “Myles Burnyeat’s Map of Metaphysics Zeta” Critical Notice, Philosophy Quarterly 55. 117-24
  • Gill, Mary-Louise (1989). Aristotle on Substance: The Paradox of Unity. Princeton University Press.
  • Sheridan, Patricia (red.) (2006). Catharine Trotter Cockburn: Philosophical Writings. Peterborough, ON: Broadview Press.

Kvindelige filosoffer der arbejder med emner relevante for ontologi: Karen Bennett, Helen Beebee, Anna-Sofia Maurin, Maureen Donnelly, Laurie Paul, Nancy Cartwright, Helen Steward, Agnes Heller

Philosophy of Emotion

  • Ferran, Íngrid Vendrell (2015). “The Emotions in Early Phenomenology“, Studia Phaenomenologica 15:349-374.
  • Ferran, Íngrid Vendrell (2019). “Empathy, Fiction and Imagination“, Special Issue Topoi
  • Roeser, Sabine (2011). Moral Emotions and Intuitions. Palgrave Macmillan; Chippenham & Eastbourne.
  • Zagzebski, Linda (2003). “Emotion and Moral Judgment”, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 66:104–24.

Politisk filosofi

  • Anderson, Elizabeth (1999). “What is the Point of Equality?”, Ethics 109: 287-337.
    Anderson, Elizabeth (2010). The Imperative of Integration. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • Arendt, Hannah (1958). The Human Condition. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
  • Butler, Judith (1990). “Subjects of Sex/Gender/Desire (Chap 1)”, i Gender Trouble. Routledge: New York.
  • Casal, Paula (2007). “Why Sufficiency is Not Enough”, Ethics, 117 (2): 296-326.
  • Cordelli, Chiara (2015). “Distributive Justice and the Problem of Friendship”, Political Studies, 63 (3): 679-695.  
  • Dalla Costa, Mariarosa (1973). “Women and the subversion of the community”, i Dalla Costa, Mariarosa & Selma James (red.) The Power of Women and the Subversion of the Community. Falling Wall Press; Bristol.
  • Fourie, Carine & Annette Rid (red.) (2016). How Much Is Enough? Sufficiency and Thresholds in Health Care. Oxford University Press;Oxford.
  • Fraser, Nancy (1995). “From Redistribution to Recognition? Dilemmas of Justice in a ‘Post-Socialist Age’ ”, New Left Review, 1(212): 68-93.
  • Fraser, Nancy& Linda Gordon (2013). “A Genealogy of ‘Dependency’: Tracing a Keyword of the US Welfare State”, i Nancy Fraser Fortunes of Feminism: From State-Managed Capitalism to Neoliberal Crisis. Verso;London & New York. 83-110.
  • Ghaus, Anca (2017). “Love and Justice: A Paradox?”, Canadian Journal of Philosophy. 47 (6) : 739-759
  • Herzog, L (2013). The Invention of the Market: Smith, Hegel and Political Theory.  Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Mouffe, Chantal (1993). “Introduction” + “Radical Democracy: Modern or Postmodern?”, i The Return to The Political. Verso;London & NEw York. 1-22
  • Mouffe, Chantal (1993). “Politics and the Political”, i On the Political: Thinking in Action. Routledge;New York. 8-20
  • Luxemburg, Rosa (2010). “Women’s Suffrage and Class Struggle”, i LeBlanc, Paul & Helen C Scott (red.) Socialism or Barbarism: The Selected Writings of Rosa Luxemburg. Pluto Press;London. 166-172
  • Nussbaum, Martha (1990). “The Discernment of Perception: An Aristotelian Conception of Private and Public Rationality (Chap 2)”, i Love’s Knowledge: Essays on Philosophy and Literature. Oxford University Press;Oxford. 
  • Nussbaum, Martha (2000). Women and Human Development. Cambridge University Press;Cambridge.
  • Nussbaum, Martha (2011). Creating Capabilities. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
  • Olsaretti, Serena (2013). “Children as Public Goods?”, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 41 (3): 226-258. 
  • Olsaretti S (2004). Liberty, Desert, and the Market. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Pateman, Carole (1988). The Sexual Contract. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  • Radin J (1996). Contested Commodities. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Robeyns, Ingrid (2006). “The Capability Approach in Practice”, Journal of Political Philosophy, 17 (3): 351-376. 
  • Sats, Debra (2010). Why Some Things Should Not Be for Sale. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 
  • Stemplowska, Zofia (2008). “Holding People Responsible for What They Do Not Control”, Politics, Philosophy, and Economics, 7: 355-377. 
  • Stemplowska, Zofia (2009). “Making Justice Sensitive to Responsibility”, Political Studies, 57: 237-259.
  • Valentini, Laura (2009). “On the Apparent Paradox of Ideal Theory”, Journal of Political Philosophy, 17 (3): 332-355. 
  • Wollstonecraft, Mary (2010). A vindication fo the rights of women, Sheila Rowbotham (red.) Verso Books.
  • Young, Iris M. (1990). Justice and the Politics of Difference. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • Ypi, Lea (2008). “Statist Cosmopolitanism”, Journal of Political Philosophy, 16 (1): 48-71.

Retsfilosofi

  • MacKinnon, C. (1983). “Feminism, Marxism, Method, and the State: Toward Feminist Jurisprudence”, Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 8(4), 635–558. 
  • MacKinnon, C. (1982). “Feminism, Marxism, Method, and the State: An Agenda for Theory”, Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 7(3), 515 – 544. 
  • Nussbaum, M. (1999). “The Feminist Critique of Liberalism”, i Sex and Social Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 55 – 80

Teknologifilosofi

  • Arendt, Hannah (2003). “The ‘Vita Activa’ and the Modern Age”, i Scharff, R.C. & Val Dusek (red.) Philosophy of Technology. The Technological Condition. An Anthology. Blackwell Publishing. 389–405.
  • Wajcman, J. (2004). “Male Designs on Technology”, i Techno-Feminism. Polity Press;Cambridge.  10–31. 

Kvindelige filosoffer der arbejder med emner relevante for teknologifilosofi: Sherry Turkle (antropolog), Aimee van Wynsberghe